Former top banker sentenced to death in China for bribery, bigamy   

Lai Xiaomin

Lai Xiaomin, chairman of China Huarong Asset Management Co., speaks during the Boao Forum for Asia Financial Cooperation Conference in Hong Kong, China, on Tuesday, July 5, 2016. China's monetary policy is loose and funds to companies are still tight, Lai said. Photographer: Anthony Kwan/Bloomberg

Beijing: The former chairman of one of China’s largest state-controlled asset management firms was sentenced to death Tuesday.  Lai Xiaomin received the death penalty for soliciting $260 million in bribes, corruption and bigamy. Lai Xiaomin is a former Communist party member.

The banker gave a detailed confession on state broadcaster CCTV in January 2020. A footage showed that his apartment here replete with safes and cabinets stuffed with stacks of cash.

Lai had abused his position in attempting to obtain the vast sum, the court in Tianjin said. It described the bribes as ‘extremely large’ and calling the circumstances ‘particularly serious’. He had shown ‘extreme malicious intent’, the court ruling added.

Lai was the former chairman of the Hong Kong-listed China Huarong Asset Management Co. He was also found guilty of bigamy after living ‘as man and wife for long periods’ outside of his marriage and fathering illegitimate children. The court in Tianjin said Lai would have all personal assets confiscated and be stripped of his political rights.

Lai, whose investigation started in April 2018, also embezzled over 25 million yuan ($3.8 million) in public funds between 2009 and 2018.

During his televised confession, Lai told CCTV he ‘did not spend a single penny, and just kept it there… I did not dare to spend it’. CCTV also showed luxury cars and gold bars that it reported Lai had accepted as bribes.

Critics have said the wide-ranging anti-corruption campaign launched under President Xi Jinping has also served as a way to target his opponents and those of the Communist Party leadership.

CCTV often broadcasts interviews with suspects admitting to crimes, even before they have appeared in court. It is a practice that has long been condemned by lawyers and rights organisations as forcing confessions under duress.

 

Exit mobile version