J&K High Court functioning normally says Supreme Court

The apex court also rejected the contention that there was need to register an FIR in connection with the Rs 58,000 crore deal.

New Delhi: The Supreme Court said Friday it has received a report from the chief justice of Jammu and Kashmir High Court and it does not support claims that people in Kashmir Valley are unable to access the court there.

Senior advocate Huzefa Ahmadi, representing child right activists Enakshi Ganguly and Shanta Sinha who have filed a plea alleging detention of children in Kashmir following the abrogation of Article 370, had September 16 told the apex court that people in the Valley are ‘not able to approach’ the high court there. The bench had then sought a report from the chief justice of Jammu and Kashmir on the issue.

“We have received a report from the chief justice (of Jammu and Kashmir High Court) which does not support your statement,” a bench headed by Chief Justice of India (CJI) Ranjan Gogoi told Ahmadi at the outset Friday.

The bench, also comprising justices SA Bobde and SA Nazeer, said it has received some ‘conflicting reports’ on the issue but it do not intend to comment on them at this stage.

However, the top court said it would entertain the plea filed by the two child rights activists as it raises ‘substantial issues and pertains to alleged detention of children’.

The bench directed the Juvenile Justice Committee of the Jammu and Kashmir High Court to file a report before it within a week on the issue raised in the petition.

Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, appearing for Jammu and Kashmir administration, told the bench that when the authorities found that one of the detenue was a juvenile, his matter was immediately referred to the juvenile justice board. “It (petition) raises substantial issues which are beyond any individual,” the bench told Tushar Mehta.

The top court posted the matter for hearing after two weeks.

PTI

 

Exit mobile version