Sourav Ganguly comes clean on controversies: This is how he slams detractors

Sourav-Jay

BCCI president Sourav Ganguly says he shares a fantastic rapport with Jay Shah PTI file photo

New Delhi: From Covid-19 disruptions to allegations that he has tried to influence selectors to criticism that not enough has been done for women’s cricket during his tenure, Sourav Ganguly has endured a challenging 26 months as BCCI president. However, Sourav Ganguly rejected all the allegations against him. He also pointed out that before had become BCCI boss, he had been a celebrated Indian cricketer. He pointed out that he played in a whopping 424 international matches, 113 of them Tests.

Ganguly however, steered clear of the drama surrounding the end of Virat Kohli’s captaincy tenure. However, he answered a host of other questions.  He also disclosed that the India-West Indies T20Is in Kolkata this month will be a ‘closed-door’. He laughed when told about speculation of a possible rift with BCCI secretary Jay Shah.

Excerpts:

There have been allegations that you have been influencing the selection committee. You sit in the meetings to put pressure on the selectors?

Read also – India’s 1000th ODI: Sachin Tendulkar takes a walk down memory lane

I don’t think I need to answer anybody anything (on this) and dignify any of these baseless accusations. I am the president of BCCI and I do the job of what the president of BCCI should be doing. Also just to let you know, I see a picture doing the rounds (of social media) showing me sitting in a selection committee meeting. I want to make it clear, that picture (where Ganguly can be seen sitting with Shah, Kohli and joint secretary Jayesh George) wasn’t from a selection committee meeting. Jayesh isn’t a part of selection committee meetings. (I have played) 424 international matches for India. Not a bad idea at times to remind people about it, isn’t it? (laughs).

How has been your working relationship with Jay Shah in the last 26 months in the Indian cricket board?

I share a fantastic relationship with Jay. He is a very dear friend and a trusted colleague. Me, Jay, Arun (Dhumal) and Jayesh (George), we have all been working together to get the board going in these difficult times especially with Covid-19 in these two years. To make sure that cricket happens. I would say it has been a fantastic two years. We have all done it as a team.

What kind of a new Test captain are you looking at after Kohli’s decision to step down?

Obviously, there are certain parameters of leadership and whoever fits the bill will be the next Indian Test captain. I believe selectors will have a name in mind and they will discuss it with office-bearers – president and secretary – and it will be announced in due course of time.

You had recently said that Rahane and Pujara will be playing Ranji Trophy. But does that mean they can get dropped for Sri Lanka Tests in March?

What I meant was that they will play Ranji Trophy as it starts before the Sri Lanka series. After that, the selectors will take a call. Ranji Trophy Elite group starts in third week of February and Sri Lanka Tests are in March. It will completely be the call of selection committee and whatever they decide.

When do we see someone like Hardik Pandya back in India fold? At least looking at options available right now, isn’t the team feeling Hardik’s absence?

Sourav Ganguly feels Hardik Pandya will have to bowl a lot to return to the Indian team Photo courtesy: espncricinfo.com

Hardik was injured and a break was given to him to completely recover, so that he can continue to serve Indian cricket for a long period of time. I believe I will see him play some Ranji Trophy to start with. I expect him to bowl a lot more overs and his body will get stronger. Also he is now captain of Ahmedabad IPL and that will be a platform where his form and fitness will be checked by selectors. Accordingly, they will take a call.

Let’s talk about Ranji Trophy. The BCCI is finally getting it started but even after increasing match fee to up to Rs 2.4 lakh per game for a certain bracket, most teams would end up playing only three first-class games. Isn’t it a financial loss and an issue for all stakeholders?

They have played Vijay Hazare and Syed Mushtaq Ali also where the match fees have increased. You have to understand that after we discussed with the medical team, it was decided to keep four teams in a group in a particular city. That was the only way we could probably maintain the sanctity of a bio-bubble in Covid times.

More number of individuals in any particular place would increase the rate of infections. That’s why venues are more and teams are less. The time-frame, as we had postponed the mid-January start due to spike in cases, was also a factor. We have to have the U-25, U-19 knock-outs, Women’s T20.

The IPL and Women’s T20 challenge is there. A lot of first-class players would be part of IPL teams. So it’s a mixture of everything. The BCCI would never want its first-class players to incur losses.

Why isn’t BCCI starting the women’s IPL straightaway? Why again a T20 Challenge when a state unit like the CAB is having a six team 90-player women’s T20 club meet?

We are at the level of formulation to have a full-fledged WIPL. It is certainly going to happen. I strongly believe that next year i.e 2023 will be a very good time to start a full-fledged women’s IPL which will be as big and grand a success as men’s IPL.

IPL is being held in India hopefully. How big a relief will that be?

Well, as BCCI has always maintained that this is the Indian Premier League and we would ideally want to hold it in India. Yes, we haven’t yet officially announced as we are still tracking the Covid-19 situation in the country. Yes, we would finalise the venues in some time. The plan is very much to hold it in India and we are preparing accordingly.

Any special celebrations planned for India’s 1000th ODI? It is the game against the West Indies Sunday?

No, nothing as such as everything is being held in the bubble. We have to maintain the Covid-19 protocols so yes elaborate celebrations won’t be possible and in any case matches are being held closed doors.

The West Bengal government has allowed 75 per cent spectators at the Eden Gardens for the three T20Is against the West Indies. However, the BCCI has decided to go for spectator-less games. Why is it so?

Let me put this on record. We are not allowing spectators at the Eden Gardens for the three T20 Internationals. There will not be any tickets for general public. The only people allowed are CAB officials and representatives of the various units.

In these times, we can’t risk the health of the players by allowing spectators. No tickets for the stands of Life or Associate members will be issued. Obviously, we have the clearance of West Bengal government, but BCCI doesn’t want to risk the health safety of players.

 

Exit mobile version